UK Supreme Court says definition of a woman is biological in landmark ruling
344 views
Apr 16, 2025
The UK Supreme Court ruled on Wednesday that the legal definition of a woman is based on biological sex not on gender certification.
View Video Transcript
0:00
The UK Supreme Court delivering a landmark ruling as the debate over gender identity takes hold
0:06
in America and across the pond. The United Kingdom's High Court ruling Wednesday
0:11
the definition of a woman under the nation's equality law is to be interpreted as referring
0:17
to biological sex. The unanimous decision by the five justices means a transgender person
0:24
even with any sort of documentation, recognizing them as female is not legally considered a female
0:31
within the Equality Act. The unanimous decision of this court is that the terms woman and sex
0:38
in the Equality Act 2010 refer to a biological woman and biological sex. The UK Supreme Court
0:47
says the statute is incoherent and unworkable if it depends on the definition of sex based on gender
0:54
identity instead of human biology. The justices, however, state this does not erase protections
1:01
against discrimination for transgender people, noting within the Equality Act, biological males
1:07
can be barred from some female-only designated spaces, including changing rooms, shelters
1:14
recreational sports areas, as well as medical settings. The UK ruling follows a 2018 law passed by the Scottish Parliament that aimed for 50
1:25
female representation on public boards and included transgender women in its definition of women The historic decision also comes as the issue remains a flashpoint in American politics with the Trump administration
1:40
saying it's aligning federal policy with the biological understanding of gender and sex
1:46
not based on identity. A challenge to the Equality Act's definition of a woman was rejected by a
1:53
lower court in 2022, but the Supreme Court agreed to hear the case last year. The group that brought
1:59
the case for Women's Scotland, which is financially backed by author J.K. Rowling, celebrated the
2:06
judgment, calling it basic common sense. Rowling also took to social media in support of the court's
2:13
decision, writing on X, it took three extraordinary, tenacious women with an army behind them to get
2:20
this case heard by the Supreme Court and in winning, they've protected the rights of women
2:25
and girls across the UK. Some LGBTQ rights groups expressed concerns over the ruling
2:31
focusing on the protections kept in place while acknowledging the ruling could lead to further
2:37
restrictions when it comes to where transgender women can go. The British and Scottish governments
2:43
meanwhile embrace the legal clarity and say they will implement the ruling as needed. While
2:48
Scotland's first minister says it will do so while protecting the rights of all citizens
2:54
in a social media post. For more on this story, you can download the Straight Arrow News app or visit us online at san.com
#Constitutional Law & Civil Rights
#Discrimination & Identity Relations
#Human Rights & Liberties
#news
#Other
#Politics
#Social Issues & Advocacy